starred/definitive-opensource-mustbeperfect
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource.git synced 2026-04-19 08:33:25 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Renamed generators to generation and added to ARCHITECTURE.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lucas
2025-04-10 08:15:32 -07:00
parent 924fdf61c7
commit 2da073ef13
9 changed files with 33 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
source/components/footer.md
View File

@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ The current system could also be considered a stepping stone to guage the commun
<details>
<summary><b>Stars aren't a good metric to guage popularity/quality.</b></summary> <br />
The minimum star count of 1k has been a major point of contention. Admittedly, star counts don't always reflect project popularity and quality. Stars are biased towards developers because they are the ones with a GitHub account, thus leaving out the input of the end users. But no solution is going to be a __one size fits all__ solution. It's critically important that as the list scales it doesn't devolve into a clutter trap, even if the price is some projects getting left out.
The minimum star count of 1k has been a major point of contention. Admittedly, star counts don't always reflect project popularity and quality. Stars are biased towards developers because they are the ones with a GitHub account, thus leaving out the input of the end users. But no solution is going to be a one size fits all solution. It's critically important that as the list scales it doesn't devolve into a clutter trap, even if the price is some projects getting left out.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
Stars tend to be synonomous with community recognition, making it a good starting point for further vetting to check for contributors, future plans, and popularity. Most compotent software will have no trouble reaching the 1k star count. This requirement is also just the first step for further vetting.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
Artificial star counts (EX: buying stars) has also been brought up. This isn't that big of a problem, again, stars are just to quality a project for further vetting. A popular project should have lots of community activity, GitHub issues, pr's, etc. Evidence of foul play will disquality a project.
Artificial star counts (EX: buying stars) has also been brought up. This isn't that big of a problem, again, stars are just to quality a project for further vetting. We check community engagement, developer responsiveness and the project's statistics over time. A popular project should have lots of community activity, GitHub issues, pr's, etc. Evidence of foul play will disquality a project.
</details>
## License