From feebdcee4857eea2ba381c1620e2ec01f2e879b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lucas <169063936+mustbeperfect@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 07:15:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed missing <details> in footer

---
 source/components/footer.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/source/components/footer.md b/source/components/footer.md
index bb1a389..a15b5cd 100644
--- a/source/components/footer.md
+++ b/source/components/footer.md
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Projects that were once on this list but removed - usually due to abandonement o
 </details>
 
 ## FAQ
+<details>
   <summary><b>Stars aren't a good metric to guage popularity/quality.</b></summary> <br />
 The minimum star count of 1k has been a major point of contention. Admittedly, star counts don't always reflect project popularity and quality. Stars are biased towards developers because they are the ones with a GitHub account, thus leaving out the input of the end users. But no solution is going to be a one size fits all solution. It's critically important that as the list scales it doesn't devolve into a clutter trap, even if the price is some projects getting left out.
 <p>&nbsp;</p>