starred/definitive-opensource
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource.git synced 2026-04-21 00:05:39 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Removed website question in FAQ

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lucas
2025-06-30 12:32:52 -07:00
parent 0745938037
commit 90634b117a
1 changed files with 0 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
source/components/footer.md
View File

@@ -25,14 +25,6 @@ Projects that were once on this list but removed - usually due to abandonement o
</details>
## FAQ
<details>
<summary><b>How about a definitive-opensource website?</b></summary> <br />
A website is definitely on the roadmap. It would provide much requested features like tag based filtering and, on the backend, automate much of what we currently have to do manually. However, for the foreseeable future, the list will remain as a markdown file for one reason: to keep things simple. The current system lets me focus solely on the projects within. The complexities of web development seem unnecessary and an added pain for a task that can suffice, for now, as a markdown file.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
The current system could also be considered a stepping stone to guage the community's needs prior to building a website, which would inherently be far more complex.
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Stars aren't a good metric to guage popularity/quality.</b></summary> <br />
The minimum star count of 1k has been a major point of contention. Admittedly, star counts don't always reflect project popularity and quality. Stars are biased towards developers because they are the ones with a GitHub account, thus leaving out the input of the end users. But no solution is going to be a one size fits all solution. It's critically important that as the list scales it doesn't devolve into a clutter trap, even if the price is some projects getting left out.
<p>&nbsp;</p>